What We Defend
- Human dignity and bodily autonomy.
- Scientific rigor and transparent sourcing.
- Non-coercive, person-centered care pathways.
- Legal and civic accountability in public systems.
This first version is intentionally focused: publish a clear mission, align contributors, and invite high-signal professionals to help build safer alternatives to coercive care.
We publish evidence-based reporting, expert analysis, and practical civic resources that reduce coercive harm and accelerate rights- respecting mental healthcare reform.
Help evaluate and communicate promising non-coercive approaches with methodological clarity.
Contribute humane care frameworks and practical alternatives for real-world implementation.
Advance rights-respecting reforms with enforceable legal and institutional safeguards.
Start here with our flagship reporting and evidence-backed long-form analysis.
Our flagship article documents the legal structure, historical record, and documented harms surrounding British Columbia's Mental Health Act.
Send leads, corrections, and product ideas that can strengthen our reporting and public resources.
Share documents, investigations, hearings, policy changes, or any developing lead that deserves a closer look.
Tell us what would make the site more useful, clearer, or more effective for readers, researchers, and contributors.
We are recruiting advocates and professionals for our founding contributor cohort. If you work in clinical care, law, policy, lived-experience advocacy, research, or investigative journalism, we want your voice in this build.
We are pro-humanity and pro-accountability. We reject dehumanization and advocate for high standards in care, law, and public discourse. We prioritize verifiable evidence, informed debate, and practical reforms that reduce harm.
This release focuses on mission and roadmap while contributor workflows, moderated submissions, and campaign tooling are built.